Thursday 15 March 2012

The Blair Witch Project film

Hi everyone,

Not sure if anyone saw this, but I recently came across a segment of the 8Days magazine that mentioned about a 1999 American psychological horror film, entitled The Blair Witch Project. Thought this film was quite interesting on several counts, which i'd like to raise and share with the class.




The Blair Witch Project was an independent film written and directed by Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez in 1999. Taking the lazy man's way of borrowing what wikipedia has (quite nicely) summed up, The Blair Witch Project film was essentially a film that appears to be "pieced together from amateur footage and relates the story of three student filmmakers (Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, and Michael C. Williams) who disappeared while hiking in the Black Hills near Burkittsville, Maryland in 1994 to film a documentary about a local legend known as the Blair Witch. The viewers are told the three were never seen or heard from again, although their video and sound equipment (along with most of the footage they shot) were discovered a year later".  You could read more about it in detail by googling it or something if you like. What was particularly distinct about this film was the debate that it stirred up among the audience and viewers who were speculating on the authenticity of the film - whether or not this film was a work of fiction or was it really based on an actual event. Of course, as we know it later, it was merely an advertising gimmick used by the producers to draw the attention of a wider audience.

This film was one the most profitable films in history when it was measured by its return on the initial investment; starting with a low budget of $50,000, the film ended grossing over $100 million in US theatrical-box-office alone. Astounding figures aside, what drew my attention to this film was the use of media deception and manipulation to garner audience interest in the film. This film was successfully marketed by publicizing the film on the internet a year before actual release in cinemas; on the website, they uploaded additional material such as footage presented as outtakes from "discovered" film reels, police reports, the "back story" on the missing film students, and a history or mythology of the Blair Witch legend, to create a false impression that this film might just be a "true" story to confirm the viewers' suspicions, and to create a feeling of suspension among viewers to keep them incited by the film. Additionally, they also cleverly omitted any explicit admission or demarcation of the promotional material as fiction or as promotional advertising to leave the audience to question the authenticity of this "mockumentary". What made the advertising of this film all the more effective was the official Blair Witch Project Website, unofficial Websites and fan pages that elaborated the film's mythology and offered original narratives, in which case we can see how audiences are manipulated by the producers/advertisers to generate buzz with regard to the promotion of this film.

Furthermore, what was even more interesting to me was to see the role of the Internet in the film's commercial success, in effectively blurring the boundaries between actual and fictional nature of the film, as seen in the incessant buzz among the viewers that were created on online forums after the film was promoted via the internet - which caused some to actually believe that this film is a real event up till today!! (Something I thought was quite hilarious!) In an article that I came across while researching more on this film, it was mentioned that this film actually instigated a paradigmatic panic among some Hollywood executives (a.k.a. the Culture Industry at large that we often like to refer to) due to the important role of the Internet in this film's commercial success. The Blair Witch Project used the Web as its central medium or primary text for the film's narrative and its reception, as well as its marketing or "franchising" more than a year before the film's major cinematic distribution. This caused the Hollywood executives, who saw themselves as being in the mainstream film industry, to fear the potential shift in using the Web, which it considers to be supplementary to established media outlets (such as mainstream TV advertisements, billboard advertisements etc.), as the main mode of publicity for films. This is quite a logical fear on the part of the Hollywood executives, who's profits from the films they produce hinges largely upon the profits generated from advertisements that accompany the films. Again, this draws us back to the profiteering-nature and tendencies of media as an Industry.

To conclude, I just thought that through this Blair Witch Project film, we could draw some analysis and insights pertaining to this whole notion of Media as a Culture Industry in the modern day context (although not quite "modern" and up-to-date anymore since this film was released 12 years ago). Hope this was an interesting read for some of you, and got you to find out more about it just as I did!

Interestingly, while researching, I found that Singapore had an independent production released in 2010, entitled Haunted Changi,  running along a similar vein as The Blair Witch Project. It also tries to use Web-based mediums to facilitate buzz and publicity for this horror documentary. Maybe somebody who knows about this might like to share more about this here, since we are encouraged to bring in some non-Western context in this module.

Matilda


Tuesday 6 March 2012


Hi everyone! Nicole here.
Introduction
After today’s mind-blowing and rather abstract discussion on the topic of “Influence”, I’ve just decided to draw up a brief summary of the concepts and issues that we have discussed as well as bring in a few ideas that I have stumbled upon while trying to break down this complex term.
From what I gather from today’s tutorial, the notion on how the mass media influences its consumers can be categorized into two large groups. The first group concerns that of the producer and the second, that of the consumer.

Media Producers
When addressing the producers of media, we need to consider the intention of why the producer has come up with a certain movie or piece of news or video clip etc. It could have the purpose of persuasion, propaganda or just a mere form of entertainment.
Persuasion has been defined as the attitude change that results from being exposed to information that is put in place by others while propaganda, as defined by Ross, is an ‘epistemically defective message with the intention to persuade a socially significant group of people on behalf of an organization, institution or cause.’ Thus, it is pretty obvious that when the producer engages in persuasive communication or propaganda, he does have the intention to influence the audience in some way or another. With respect to media as a form of entertainment, the idea of influence is not so straightforward and largely depends on how consumers interpret these forms of entertainment, which I will be touching on later.
We talked about a few techniques that producers make use of with the intention to influence and two of them would be the idea of framing and agenda-setting. Tankard defines a frame as ‘a central organizing idea for news content that supplies a context and suggests what the issue is through the use of selection, emphasis, exclusion and elaboration.’ This then led us to the issue of power relations as frames, more often than not, are defined by those who have a say, those who have power.

Media consumers
As for media consumption, I’ll like to expand on this concept of interpretation of media by the audience. I think we have established that ‘The Bullet Theory’ is no longer as applicable to society as consumers are no longer as vulnerable to media messages as we have different ways of interpreting a text.
 Some characteristics of audiences are as follows:
1.     Audiences are selective people.
2.     Audiences have their own background knowledge and views of certain issues.
3.     Audiences are not isolated individuals and their surrounding plays an important part in crafting their views.
4.     Audiences live in different social contexts.
All in all, audiences are not passive and they are a heterogeneous group.

To what extent?
Our discussion then led us to the question on the degree of how media influences us. I think for starters, we can address the people who consumes the media. There is this concept known as the ‘four rings of defense’ as to how audiences filter and interpret messages.
The first ring is that audiences perform selective exposure in the sense that they only expose themselves to communications that are in agreement with their existing attitudes and avoid those that disagree. The second ring is that audiences perform selective perception which is the tendency for people’s perception to be influenced by wants, needs, attitudes and other factors. The third ring is that of selective attention, where the audience only pays attention to those messages that are in agreement with their views. And lastly, the fourth ring is selective retention, in which the audience only retains information that they find to be more favourable.
I guess we can use this model to evaluate to what extent the audience is influenced by the mass media. There are I’m sure many other concepts and issues that are not covered, however, I feel that this is just one of the many frameworks that can help us through the complicated process of media interpretation.
Conclusion
So these are just my thoughts on what we discussed during tutorial today! I’m sorry if some statements that I mentioned are sweeping ones or too generalized as I’m still a bit fuzzy with this concept myself, so do correct me if I’m wrong! :)
Nonetheless, I know this post is rather lengthy haha but I hope it managed to help in some way or another! :)
Have a good week ahead everyone!

P.s. There is a ‘comments’ link at the end of every post, so please feel free to comment on the other posts that our classmates have written!